Monday, December 10, 2012

My Career Path!

When first starting this course I had a very specific career path that i wanted to accomplish. Growing up around experimental aircraft, my dream has always been to work in that field. I used to always hope for a job working with the Experimental Aircraft Association. 

Throughout the senior seminar course my course my career path has not changed much, it has just become less strict. Although I would still love to acquire a job working with experimental aircraft, I now believe that I would also enjoy other aviation career choices. I want to progress my qualifications in aviation as much as possible, I want to be the best possible aviator I can be. This means that I need to experience many different facets of aviation. Although I can not give many specific examples as to why my extremely selective career choice as expanded, I can say that I believe this is because of all the different guest speakers I got to experience this year in senior seminar. All of the men and women who explained their career choices seemed very passionate and excited about what they do, which is why I believe that I would be happy with different types of careers. 

The most interesting to me blog topic I have written about so far is my blog about experimental aircraft. As I stated in that post, I believe that for non commercial purposes, you really can't beat experimental aircraft considering the "wow factor" for the price that you pay. 

Out of all the guest speakers we had during senior seminar this year, my favorite were the girls from the Detroit Metro air traffic control tower. Previously I did not have much knowledge about ATC, and after they spoke I really think I learned a lot. They both seemed to really enjoy what they do which I also appreciate. 

After graduation, I know that I may not snag my dream job right away. Knowing this, I know that as long as I stay focused and aspire to achieve, I will reach my goals eventually. I plan on soon becoming a CFI and after that I think I would enjoy teaching others to fly, sharing in my passion.

Sunday, December 2, 2012

EU Emissions Trading System

     The European Union's Emissions Trading System was implemented in 2005 to put a limit on the amount of green house gases that can be emitted by factories, power plants, vehicles and anything that produces green house gases. 

     Each year, companies are allotted a certain number of coupons or allowances. These allowances represent a certain number of green house gases that the company can produce for the year. If the company uses less than the amount of allowance they have, they can then sell the remaining allowances to other companies who might go over their allowance. However, if the company produces more green house gases than their allowances dictate, they must pay a fine.

     So... how does this help the environment? Well, each year, companies allowances are lowered. This encourages companies to find more "green" ways of operation. According to the European Commission, this trading system provides the same benefits to society, at a lower cost than taxes.

     This has caused much controversy with non-European countries such as the United States. If the European Union gets it how they want it, Airlines of the United States will have to pay into this while counting emissions that are put out on flights that are enroute to Europe, not just the portion of the flight that is in European Airspace. This of course has enraged the United States government, which believes it is ridiculous for the European Union to force non-European airlines from paying while not in European airspace.

     I believe that the European Union has all the right to tax non-European airlines to fly into Europe, however it i ridiculous for them to charge while not flying in European airspace. Additionally, Europe better believe that other countries are going to counter these fees with fee of their own.

     About the aviation pollutions and green house gases. Efficient engines and aircraft are great and are a necessity of the future, however the way that the European Union is trying to force "green" is simply not right.

Tuesday, November 13, 2012

NEXTGEN

    NEXTGEN, or the Next Generation Air Transportation system is a change in how we all currently fly. NEXTGEN increase safety as well as reduce fuel usage by few delays. The purpose of NEXTGEN is to provide an all around better flying experience.

     NEXTGEN is based upon four pillars. These pillars are economic impact, sustainability, flexibility and safety. In terms of importance, I rank these pillars in order from most important to least important as safety, economic impact, sustainability and finally flexibility. I rank safety as number one because any advances in safety to help further protect human life agains disasters is always a great thing. After safety, I rank economic impact because of the fragile state of our economy. It is said by the FAA that the economic impact of civil aviation creates over 10 million jobs and circulates over 1.3 trillion dollars. This accounts from over 5% of the U.S. GDP, a rather significant number in my opinion.

     Safety will be improved by NEXTGEN by using advanced satellite-based surveillance which will deliver weather, airspace and traffic notifications to flight crews in a quick manner. By having this up-to-date information, flight crews will have an advantage in making important decisions.

     The economic impact of civil aviation is tremendous. Because of this, it is important that the air traffic control system to be advanced and up-to-date.

     With new equipment helping flight crews to enhance routes, minimize ground time and holding time, less fuel will be burned. Not only will this save money, but it will have a smaller detrimental effect of the fuel usage on our planet and atmosphere.

     Flexibilty in travel routes is important for several reasons. One being that companies will spend less time in the air traveling the same route, lowering the cost of operation, therefor increasing profit margins. As well as the monetary benefits, NEXTGEN will also improve flight crew ability to circumnavigate bad weather, increasing safety and of course, burning less fuel.

     NEXTGEN may sound great, but it does have its negatives. ADS-B, Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast is the technology that NEXTGEN will utilize. This equipment, which will be required by a majority of aircraft is quite expensive. This equipment may cost upwards of several thousands of dollars to over tens of thousands of dollars, is just not affordable to the average weekend flyer who happens to own his or her own aircraft.

     I believe that NEXTGEN is a great thing and it will benefit the aviation community, as well as the economy. I foresee increases in travel, therefor creating more jobs for pilots and ground operations.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

Pilot Retirement Age

     The airline pilot (part 121 flight operations) retirement age has recently been increased from 60 to 65 because of the Fair Treatment for Experienced Pilots Act. Many people, mainly the pilots who fly for these part 121 operators, agree that this is a good thing. These pilots get to fly for an extra five years, therefor earning an extra five years worth of pay. However, other people, such as the general flying public, may argue to say that a person of that age should not be able to fly because of safety reasons.

     How should retirement age for pilots be determined? The current 65 rule sounds nice, but it takes no consideration of ability. Just because a person has reached their 65th birthday doesn't mean that they are immediately unsafe to fly an aircraft. That could happen many years down the road, or even before reaching the age of 65.

     It is a well know idea in the aviation industry that expertise comes with experience. This means that a pilot of the age of 60 will have more experience, thereof more expertise in the skill of piloting an aircraft. This brings up a valid reason why pilots should be able to fly longer than the age of 60. However, if all these pilots are able to work for an additional 5 years, what does that mean for all the new pilots looking for jobs? Well that means their will be a lot less of them.

     Another benefit to the increase in age, as said by LeftSeat.com, is that these extra five years of work will help pilots recoup some extra money to offset some of their decreases in pensions.

     I personally have mixed feelings about the increase retirement age regulation. On hand, I know this means finding a job will be a much more difficult task. On the other hand, These men and women over the age of 60 have a right to work just like an other human being. I also know that people over 60 can be perfectly capable of piloting aircraft.



   

Sunday, October 28, 2012

A Look at Experimental Aircraft

     An experimental aircraft is a category of aircraft in which the production and manufacturing has not been certified as a standard certified aircraft. In a nutshell, this is the world of homebuilt aircraft.

     Since the beginning of homebuilt aircraft some 80 years ago, the advancement of experimentals has grown significantly. From a predominantly wood and fabric type construction popular in the 1930, technology has now grown into all metal and even composite type structures we see today.

     So what are the advantages of experimental/homebuilt aircraft? Well, there are several. First being the cost advantage. Comparing 2 popular aircraft from both certified and experimental categories we have the Cessna 172 and a Van's RV-8. The Cessna, being one of the most popular training aircraft ever built has a price tag of over $300,000. The Van's, a popular 2 place sport plane can have a price ranging anywhere from $50,000 to a little over $100,000 depending on chosen engine and avionics. Now lets compare the speeds of these aircraft. A Cessna 172 with an IO-360 engine cruises around 120-130 knots on an average depending on winds. An RV-8 on the other hand, with the same exact engine can cruise at over 200 knots with favorable winds at a fuel burn similar to that of the Cessna. Another advantage of experimental/homebuilt aircraft is the option to build your own from scratch, plans, or kits. This gives the builder endless customization options that are not possible with Certified aircraft.

     Now lets talk about a disadvantage. Most people who tend to avoid experimental aircraft avoid them because they are, in fact, experimental. Although an experimental aircraft gets conditional inspections similar to annual inspections that certified aircraft receive, their manufacturing and building process is not proven to be held to the standards of certified aircraft. Although these aircraft may seem to be less safe because of their nature, a study by the FAA as said by the EAA, experimental aircraft have an accident rate of less than 1% higher than the general aviation fleet.

     I believe that experimental aircraft hold a vital role in todays aviation infrastructure. With over 30,000 registered experimental aircraft in the United States, it is easy to image the amount of money flow experimental aviation creates.

     I find experimental aviation to be a vital role in my career because I hope one day to have a job in some aspect of experimental aircraft. Wether that job may be a representative for a specific company or simply a transition training flight instructor, I hope to see myself surrounded by this wonderful aspect of aviation as my career.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

General Aviation in China

     General Aviation in China has not yet caught up to par with countries such as the United States. However, it is growing at a rate that might surprise some. Prior to the mid 90's, Chinese GA was almost non existent. According to Export.gov, GA in China started to increase every year after 1996. But why is this? Why is GA in China finally starting to boom?

     One very notable aircraft manufacturer, Cessna, is having the new model Cessna 162 Skycatcher assembled by Shenyang Aircaft Corp. based in Northeast China. Interesting enough, when this information came public, several confirmed purchases demanded there deposits back. So why is Cessna, a company who profited over $30 million in 2011 deciding to build there new light sport aircraft over sees? One would presume that such a well established American company would keep their production in the United States. Many say that because of the decrease labor costs of oversees production that the lower cost of the aircraft will benefit flight schools and new aspiring pilots. Others however say that this is detrimental to the U.S. economy and all the possible jobs it would create if this aircraft were to be built in America. I for one, agree with the latter.

     Now, enough about the Skycatcher... back to the boom of GA in China. One reason I believe that this is happening is because of the population boom. Today, the population of China is almost 1.5 billion people. Compare this to 1970 when the population was 830 million. This is still a great number, but almost half of what it is today. With such an increase in population size, people and products have a higher need for transportation and delivery than as of 40 years ago. Another reason I believe the Chinese GA scene is growing is because of the government's realization of GA importance. In previous times, airspace and flight was so extremely restricted in China. Now it is more loose and accommodable, making flight training and recreational flights easier.

     So what does this huge growth in Chinese GA mean for Americans? Well, it could be looked at both ways. A pilot may see that career opportunities are now expanding giving more opportunities for oversees jobs. An engineer on the other hand, may see that the several U.S. aircraft manufacturers now producing aircraft oversees as a job threat. It really is all based upon your outlook. I do not believe that the growth of GA in China to be a threat to myself personally, however if I were an aspiring mechanic or engineer hoping to snag a job assembling aircraft, I would probably feel a little bit different.

Sunday, October 7, 2012

Brief History of Comair

     Comair was a regional airline formerly operated by Delta which ceased operations on September 29th of this year. Headquartered in Cincinnati at KCVG, Comair's first aircraft were two Piper Navajos. In 1984, Comair became a Delta Connections Carrier. In 2001, just 2 years after Comair became fully owned by Delta at a price of over $2 Billion, the Comair pilots went on strike which grounded the entire fleet of aircraft for almost 3 full months. Because of opening a new base at JFK in 2006, Comair had the worst record of on time flight in the entire United States. In 2010 Comair stated it would start decreasing it's fleet by removing all of the Bombardier CRJ100/200 series aircraft. Finally on September 29th, Comair ceased operations for good.

     So why did Comair cease operations? Well, according to Delta, the company plans to reduce it's fleet of regional aircraft from 350 to 125 or fewer, and focus more attention towards mainline flights.

     You may be thinking, what is the overall status of the regional airlines industry? Well it is not very good. With some closing operations and others frequently furloughing pilots, it is quiet obvious that they are not very successful right now. According to USATODAY, the average salary of a regional airline co-pilot is roughly $21,000. In my opinion, this is absolutely pathetic considering the amount of training that a person has to go through to become a pilot.

     It seems as though since a lot of the major airlines are ceasing their regional operations, jobs for regional carriers will be very hard to come by, and even if you get one, chances are you won't keep it for very long!

     Now heres a good question, are any regional airlines hiring currently? According to AirlinePilotCentral, ExpressJet is currently hiring. With minimum requirements of 1200TT and 50ME, the guaranteed 75 hours a month at $23 an hour does not sound very enticing.